Senator CAUGHT Voting Both Ways – Hypocrisy!

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna exposed Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s apparent hypocrisy by highlighting her 2021 vote for Democratic election reforms while she now opposes similar Republican measures on federalism grounds.

Story Snapshot

Luna called out Murkowski on X with evidence of her contradictory voting record, igniting conservative backlash.
Murkowski opposed the 2026 SAVE Act, citing federal overreach, despite supporting 2021 Democratic bills.
X community notes amplified the criticism, framing Murkowski as inconsistent.
House passed SAVE Act overwhelmingly; Senate remains divided amid intra-GOP tensions.
The clash underscores fractures in Republican ranks over election integrity and states’ rights.

Timeline of the Confrontation

Senator Lisa Murkowski posted on X on February 10, 2026, rejecting the Republican SAVE Act and MEGA proposals. She argued federal overreach undermines state election authority, echoing her past stance against 2021 Democratic reforms. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna struck back on February 11 with a pointed X post: “Just gonna leave this here Lisa,” attaching proof of Murkowski’s 2021 vote for those Democratic measures. Conservative outlets amplified the exchange by February 12-13. X users added community notes to Murkowski’s post, bolstering Luna’s claim of inconsistency. This rapid social media skirmish thrust the issue into national conservative discourse.

Murkowski’s 2021 Voting Record Versus 2026 Stance

In 2021, Democrats pushed the For the People Act, a sweeping federal election overhaul that Republicans decried as overreach. Murkowski stood alone as the sole Republican senator voting for core elements of this legislation. Fast forward to 2026: Republicans introduced the SAVE Act, mandating proof of citizenship for federal voting to enhance integrity. Murkowski opposed it outright, citing identical federalism concerns and tight state implementation timelines. Luna spotlighted this flip, questioning Murkowski’s principles. Facts confirm the votes; the disconnect fuels accusations of selective federalism.

Key Players and Their Motivations

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Florida conservative firebrand, champions election security. She leveraged X to challenge Murkowski’s credibility, elevating her profile among base voters wary of RINO moderates. Senator Murkowski, Alaska’s long-serving independent streak, prioritizes state control over elections. House Republicans rallied behind SAVE, passing it with near-unanimity plus one Democrat. Senate leaders like Mitch McConnell and Susan Collins hesitated, mirroring Murkowski’s caution. Conservative media such as Gateway Pundit and Townhall framed Luna as the accountability warrior. Community note contributors acted as crowd-sourced fact-checkers, tilting the narrative against Murkowski.

Power imbalances favored Murkowski institutionally as a senator, yet Luna’s viral tactic neutralized that through grassroots amplification. This dynamic reveals how social media empowers junior members to punch above their weight.

Anna Paulina Luna Blows Up Disgusting RINO Lisa Murkowsky – Catches Her in an Outright Lie on Her Voting Rights Record https://t.co/Yawe9J6f82 #gatewaypundit via @gatewaypundit

— CebuJohn (@johnbrockport) February 13, 2026

Broader Implications for Republicans and Elections

The spat exposes GOP fissures: conservatives demand federal voter safeguards post-2020 concerns, while moderates like Murkowski defend state primacy—a core conservative value. SAVE’s House triumph signals base strength, but Senate divisions doom its near-term odds. Murkowski risks further isolation, energizing primary foes. Luna gains as an integrity crusader. Long-term, this debate shapes federal versus state election roles, impacting voters with potential ID mandates. Election officials face procedural upheavals; states brace for compliance battles. Common sense aligns with Luna’s push for verifiable citizenship—basic to fair elections—over unproven federalism excuses when records contradict rhetoric.